View:
Download DOC
Download PDF
Download XLS
Download XBRL
Document

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
  
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2017
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number: 001-37362
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
 
47-1846692
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2020
Houston, Texas
 
77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip code)
(713) 445-3200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No ☐  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý   No ☐ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): 
Large accelerated filer
ý
 
Accelerated filer
☐
Non-accelerated filer
☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
☐
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ý
As of May 3, 2017, there were 97,697,711 common limited partner units, 95,388,424 subordinated limited partner units, and 26,426 preferred units of the registrant outstanding.
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





ii
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Item 1. Financial Statements 
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
 
March 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
ASSETS
 
 

 
 

CURRENT ASSETS
 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
14,005

 
$
9,772

Accounts receivable
 
74,974

 
68,181

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
1,121

 
1,036

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
90,100

 
78,989

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
 

 
 

Oil and natural gas properties, at cost, using the successful efforts method of accounting, includes unproved properties of $671,131 and $605,736 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
2,776,651

 
2,697,073

Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization, and impairment
 
(1,679,267
)
 
(1,652,930
)
Oil and natural gas properties, net
 
1,097,384

 
1,044,143

Other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $14,369 and $14,327 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
579

 
528

NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
1,097,963

 
1,044,671

Deferred charges and other long-term assets
 
11,659

 
5,167

TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
1,199,722

 
$
1,128,827

LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND EQUITY
 
 

 
 

CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 

 
 

Accounts payable
 
$
3,949

 
$
4,142

Accrued liabilities
 
38,704

 
50,952

Commodity derivative liabilities
 
4,941

 
16,237

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
47,594

 
71,331

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
 
 

 
 

Credit facility
 
388,000

 
316,000

Accrued incentive compensation
 
1,873

 
1,485

Commodity derivative liabilities
 
—

 
482

Deferred revenue
 
658

 
518

Asset retirement obligations
 
13,599

 
13,350

TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
451,724

 
403,166

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
 


 


MEZZANINE EQUITY
 
 

 
 

Partners' equity - convertible redeemable preferred units, 33 and 53 units outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
34,145

 
54,015

EQUITY
 
 

 
 

Partners' equity - general partner interest
 
—

 
—

Partners' equity - common units, 97,696 and 95,721 units outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
520,052

 
489,023

Partners' equity - subordinated units, 95,388 and 95,164 units outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
192,796

 
181,602

Noncontrolling interests
 
1,005

 
1,021

TOTAL EQUITY
 
713,853

 
671,646

TOTAL LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND EQUITY
 
$
1,199,722

 
$
1,128,827

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)


 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
REVENUE
 
 

 
 

 
Oil and condensate sales
 
$
40,474

 
$
27,248

 
Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales
 
47,701

 
25,112

 
Gain (loss) on commodity derivative instruments
 
22,725

 
10,626

 
Lease bonus and other income
 
13,682

 
1,395

 
TOTAL REVENUE
 
124,582

 
64,381

 
OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE
 
 

 
 

 
Lease operating expense
 
4,189

 
4,889

 
Production costs and ad valorem taxes
 
11,902

 
7,062

 
Exploration expense
 
562

 
8

 
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
 
26,379

 
21,721

 
Impairment of oil and natural gas properties
 
—

 
6,096

 
General and administrative
 
17,212

 
17,401

 
Accretion of asset retirement obligations
 
247

 
274

 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
 
(924
)
 
(4,680
)
 
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
 
59,567

 
52,771

 
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
 
65,015

 
11,610

 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
 
 

 
 

 
Interest and investment income
 
6

 
153

 
Interest expense
 
(3,507
)
 
(1,048
)
 
Other income (expense)
 
69

 
34

 
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE
 
(3,432
)
 
(861
)
 
NET INCOME (LOSS)
 
61,583

 
10,749

 
NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
 
(9
)
 
(2
)
 
DISTRIBUTIONS ON REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS
 
(1,114
)
 
(1,804
)
 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER AND COMMON AND SUBORDINATED UNITS
 
$
60,460

 
$
8,943

 
ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS):
 
 

 
 

 
General partner interest
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
Common units
 
35,517

 
8,320

 
Subordinated units
 
24,943

 
623

 
 
 
$
60,460

 
$
8,943

 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO LIMITED PARTNERS PER COMMON AND SUBORDINATED UNIT:
 
 

 
 

 
Per common unit (basic)
 
$
0.37

 
$
0.09

 
Weighted average common units outstanding (basic)
 
96,901

 
96,484

 
Per subordinated unit (basic)
 
$
0.26

 
$
0.01

 
Weighted average subordinated units outstanding (basic)
 
95,149

 
94,995

 
Per common unit (diluted)
 
$
0.37

 
$
0.09

 
Weighted average common units outstanding (diluted)
 
97,590

 
96,752

 
Per subordinated unit (diluted)
 
$
0.26

 
$
0.01

 
Weighted average subordinated units outstanding (diluted)
 
95,149

 
94,995

 
DISTRIBUTIONS DECLARED AND PAID:
 
 

 
 

 
Per common unit
 
$
0.2875

 
$
0.2625

 
Per subordinated unit
 
$
0.1838

 
$
0.1838

 

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)



 
 
Common
units
 
Subordinated
units
 
Partners'
equity—
common
units
 
Partners'
equity—
subordinated
units
 
Noncontrolling
interests
 
Total
equity
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2016
 
95,721

 
95,164

 
$
489,023

 
$
181,602

 
$
1,021

 
$
671,646

Restricted units granted, net of forfeitures
 
1,565

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Equity-based compensation
 
—

 
—

 
16,247

 
271

 
—

 
16,518

Conversion of redeemable preferred units
 
201

 
263

 
2,868

 
3,756

 
—

 
6,624

Repurchases of common and subordinated units
 
(426
)
 
(39
)
 
(7,553
)
 
(292
)
 
—

 
(7,845
)
Issuance of units for property acquisitions
 
635

 
—

 
12,199

 
—

 
—

 
12,199

Distributions
 
—

 
—

 
(27,920
)
 
(17,484
)
 
(25
)
 
(45,429
)
Charges to partners' equity for accrued distribution equivalent rights
 
—

 
—

 
(329
)
 
—

 
—

 
(329
)
Net income (loss)
 
—

 
—

 
36,079

 
25,495

 
9

 
61,583

Distributions on redeemable preferred units
 
—

 
—

 
(562
)
 
(552
)
 
—

 
(1,114
)
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2017
 
97,696

 
95,388

 
$
520,052

 
$
192,796

 
$
1,005

 
$
713,853

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)


 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 

 
 

Net income (loss)
 
$
61,583

 
$
10,749

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 

 
 

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
 
26,379

 
21,721

Impairment of oil and natural gas properties
 
—

 
6,096

Accretion of asset retirement obligations
 
247

 
274

Amortization of deferred charges
 
215

 
197

(Gain) loss on commodity derivative instruments
 
(22,725
)
 
(10,626
)
Net cash received on settlement of commodity derivative instruments
 
4,278

 
20,581

Equity-based compensation
 
4,661

 
5,900

(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
 
(924
)
 
(4,680
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 

 
 

Accounts receivable
 
(6,568
)
 
(3,039
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
(85
)
 
(196
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
(2,739
)
 
(20,814
)
Deferred revenue
 
(325
)
 
(203
)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations
 
(43
)
 
(54
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
63,954

 
25,906

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 

 
 

Additions to oil and natural gas properties
 
(17,615
)
 
(25,110
)
Purchase of other property and equipment
 
(93
)
 
(5
)
Proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties
 
1,993

 
33

Acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties
 
(48,371
)
 
(10,000
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
(64,086
)
 
(35,082
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 

 
 

Borrowings under senior line of credit
 
103,000

 
61,000

Repayments of borrowings under senior line of credit
 
(31,000
)
 
(11,000
)
Distributions to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. common and subordinated unitholders
 
(45,404
)
 
(42,864
)
Distributions to redeemable preferred unitholders
 
(1,619
)
 
(1,946
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
(25
)
 
(33
)
Redemptions of redeemable preferred units
 
(12,742
)
 
—

Repurchases of common and subordinated units
 
(7,845
)
 
(4,201
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
4,365

 
956

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
4,233

 
(8,220
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - beginning of the period
 
9,772

 
13,233

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - end of the period
 
$
14,005

 
$
5,013

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
 
 
 
 
Interest paid
 
$
3,156

 
$
829

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     
NOTE 1—BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Description of the business: Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (“BSM” or the “Partnership”) is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership formed on September 16, 2014. On May 6, 2015, BSM completed its initial public offering (the “IPO”) of 22,500,000 common units representing limited partner interests at a price to the public of $19.00 per common unit. BSM received proceeds of $391.5 million from the sale of its common units, net of underwriting discount, structuring fee, and offering expenses (including costs previously incurred and capitalized). BSM used the net proceeds from the IPO to repay substantially all indebtedness outstanding under its credit facility. On May 1, 2015, BSM’s common units began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BSM.”
Black Stone Minerals Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “BSMC” or the “Predecessor”) own oil and natural gas mineral interests in the United States. In connection with the IPO, BSMC was merged into a wholly owned subsidiary of BSM, with BSMC as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the merger, the Class A and Class B common units representing limited partner interests of the Predecessor were converted into an aggregate of 72,574,715 common units and 95,057,312 subordinated units of BSM at a conversion ratio of 12.9465:1 for 0.4329 common units and 0.5671 subordinated units, and the preferred units of BSMC were converted into an aggregate of 117,963 preferred units of BSM at a conversion ratio of one to one. The merger was accounted for as a combination of entities under common control with assets and liabilities transferred at their carrying amounts in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, all references to the “Partnership” or similar expressions for time periods prior to the IPO refer to Black Stone Minerals Company, L.P. and its subsidiaries, the Predecessor, for accounting purposes. For time periods subsequent to the IPO, these terms refer to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and its subsidiaries.
In addition to mineral interests, which make up the vast majority of the asset base, the Partnership’s assets also include nonparticipating and overriding royalty interests. These interests, which are non-cost-bearing, are collectively referred to as “mineral and royalty interests.” As of March 31, 2017, the Partnership’s mineral and royalty interests are located in most of the major onshore oil and natural gas producing basins spread across 41 states and 64 onshore oil and natural gas producing basins of the continental United States. The Partnership also owns non-operated working interests in certain oil and natural gas properties.
Basis of presentation: The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all disclosures required for financial statements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements include the consolidated results of the Partnership. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
In the opinion of management, all material adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented have been reflected. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The Partnership evaluates the significant terms of its investments to determine the method of accounting to be applied to each respective investment. Investments in which the Partnership has less than a 20% ownership interest and does not have control or exercise significant influence are accounted for under the cost method. The Partnership’s cost method investment is included in deferred charges and other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Investments in which the Partnership exercises control are consolidated, and the noncontrolling interests of such investments, which are not attributable directly or indirectly to the Partnership, are presented as a separate component of net income and equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements include undivided interests in oil and natural gas property rights. The Partnership accounts for its share of oil and natural gas property rights by reporting its proportionate share of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs, and cash flows within the relevant lines on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, and statements of cash flows.
Segment reporting: The Partnership operates in a single operating and reportable segment. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Partnership’s chief executive officer has

5
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

been determined to be the chief operating decision maker and allocates resources and assesses performance based upon financial information at the consolidated level.

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Significant accounting policies: Significant accounting policies are disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. There have been no changes in such policies or the application of such policies during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
New accounting pronouncements: In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an accounting standards update on a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition. The new accounting guidance creates a framework under which an entity will allocate the transaction price to separate performance obligations and recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. Under the new standard, entities will be required to use judgment and make estimates, including identifying performance obligations in a contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation, and determining when an entity satisfies its performance obligations. The standard allows for either “full retrospective” adoption, meaning that the standard is applied to all of the periods presented with a cumulative catch-up adjustment as of the earliest period presented, or “modified retrospective” adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with a cumulative catch-up as of the current period. In July 2015, the FASB decided to defer the original effective date by one year to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 instead of December 15, 2016 for public entities, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership intends to use the modified retrospective adoption approach. Based on current evaluations to-date, the Partnership does not anticipate this new guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate the disclosure requirements of this new guidance and does not plan on early adopting this guidance.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize the lease assets and lease liabilities classified as operating leases on the balance sheet. The amendment will be effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Partnership is evaluating the impact that the new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, to address diversity in practice of how certain cash receipts and cash payments are currently presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU addresses the topic of separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. Classification of cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows should be determined first by applying specific guidance, and then by the nature of each separately identifiable cash flow. In situations where there is an absence of specific guidance and the cash flow has aspects of more than one type of classification, the predominance principle should be applied whereby the cash flow classification should depend on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Partnership is evaluating the impact that the new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosure.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), which clarifies the definition of a business in order to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The FASB issued this ASU in response to stakeholder feedback that the current definition of a business in ASC 805 is being applied too broadly and the application of the guidance was not resulting in consistent application in a cost effective manner. This ASU provides a screen whereby a transaction will be accounted for as an asset purchase (or disposal) if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (disposed) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If the screen is not met, the entity will evaluate whether it is a business acquisition under revised criteria. The ASU is effective for public business entities in fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted under certain circumstances. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Partnership is evaluating the impact that the new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.




6
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) liability reflects the present value of estimated costs of dismantlement, removal, site reclamation, and similar activities associated with the Partnership’s working-interest oil and natural gas properties. The Partnership utilizes current retirement costs to estimate the expected cash outflows for retirement obligations. The Partnership estimates the ultimate productive life of its properties, a credit-adjusted risk-free rate, and an inflation factor in order to determine the current present value of this obligation. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the present value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and natural gas property balance. The following table describes changes to the Partnership’s ARO liability during the period:
 
 
For the three months ended
 
March 31, 2017
 
(In thousands)
Beginning asset retirement obligations
$
13,350

   Liabilities incurred
45

   Liabilities settled
(43
)
   Accretion expense
247

   Revisions
—

Ending asset retirement obligations
$
13,599

 
 
NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Acquisitions of proved oil and natural gas properties and working interests are considered business combinations and are recorded at their estimated fair value as of the acquisition date. Acquisitions of unproved oil and natural gas properties are considered asset acquisitions and are recorded at cost.
2017 Acquisitions and Dispositions
During the first quarter of 2017, the Partnership executed the following transactions:
On January 4, 2017, the Partnership acquired mineral and royalty interests in Loving County, Texas for approximately $22.3 million in cash.  

 
(In thousands)
Proved oil and natural gas properties
$
3,331

Unproved oil and natural gas properties
18,802

Net working capital
204

    Total fair value
$
22,337

On January 10, 2017, the Partnership acquired mineral and royalty interests in Loving and Winkler Counties of Texas for approximately $5.0 million in cash and $12.0 million of the Partnership’s common units.  In addition, acquisition related costs of $1.2 million were expensed and included in the general and administrative line item of the 2017 consolidated statement of operations.

 
(In thousands)
Proved oil and natural gas properties
$
1,804

Unproved oil and natural gas properties
15,206

Net working capital
59

    Total fair value
$
17,069



7
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In addition, several mineral and royalty interest acquisitions were closed in Angelina County, Texas for an aggregate amount of approximately $16.6 million in cash and $0.2 million of the Partnership’s common units.  There were two additional mineral and royalty interest acquisitions in Loving and Winkler Counties in Texas for approximately $3.4 million in cash. One additional royalty interest purchase closed in San Augustine County, Texas for approximately $1.0 million. The cash portion of all of the above transactions was funded via proceeds from the Partnership's credit facility.
On February 21, 2017, the Partnership announced that it had entered into a farmout agreement with Canaan Resource Partners ("Canaan") which covers certain Haynesville and Bossier shale acreage in San Augustine County, Texas operated by XTO Energy Inc. The Partnership has an approximate 50% working interest in the acreage and is the largest mineral owner. A total of 18 wells are anticipated to be drilled over an initial phase, beginning with wells spud after January 1, 2017. At its option, Canaan may participate in two additional phases with each phase continuing for the lesser of two years or until an additional 20 wells have been drilled. During the three phases of the agreement, Canaan will commit on a phase-by-phase basis and fund 80% of the Partnership's drilling and completion costs and will be assigned 80% of the Partnership's working interests in such wells (40% working interest on an 8/8ths basis). After the third phase, Canaan can earn 40% of the Partnership’s working interest (20% working interest on an 8/8ths basis) in additional wells drilled in the area by continuing to fund 40% of the Partnership's costs for those wells on a well-by-well basis. The Partnership will receive a base overriding royalty interest (“ORRI”) before payout and an additional ORRI after payout on all wells drilled under the agreement. The execution of this agreement is anticipated to reduce the Partnership's future capital expenditures by approximately $30-$35 million in 2017 and by an average of $40-$50 million annually, thereafter.
2016 Acquisitions and Dispositions
On January 8, 2016, the Partnership acquired mineral and royalty interests in the Permian Basin for $10.0 million in cash.
On June 15, 2016, the Partnership acquired an oil and natural gas mineral asset package primarily located in Weld County, Colorado for $34.0 million in cash. The following table summarizes the fair values assigned to the properties acquired:
 
 
(In thousands)
Proved oil and natural gas properties
$
18,948

Unproved oil and natural gas properties
14,082

Net working capital
1,038

Asset retirement obligations
(50
)
   Total fair value
$
34,018

 
On June 17, 2016, the Partnership acquired a diverse oil and natural gas mineral package from Freeport-McMoRan Oil and Gas, Inc. for $87.6 million in cash. The following table summarizes the fair values assigned to the properties acquired:
 
 
(In thousands)
Proved oil and natural gas properties
$
20,787

Unproved oil and natural gas properties
65,745

Net working capital
1,026

   Total fair value
$
87,558



NOTE 5—DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Partnership’s ongoing operations expose it to changes in the market price for oil and natural gas. To mitigate the inherent commodity price risk associated with its operations, the Partnership uses oil and natural gas derivative instruments. From time to time, such instruments may include fixed-price-swap contracts, fixed price contracts, costless collars, and other contractual arrangements. The Partnership enters into oil and natural gas derivative contracts that contain netting arrangements with each counterparty. The Partnership does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

8
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of March 31, 2017, the Partnership’s open derivative contracts consisted of only fixed-price-swap contracts. A fixed-price-swap contract between the Partnership and the counterparty specifies a fixed commodity price and a future settlement date. The Partnership has not designated any of its contracts as fair value or cash flow hedges. Accordingly, any changes in the fair value of the contracts are included in the consolidated statement of operations in the period of the change. All derivative gains and losses from the Partnership’s derivative contracts have been recognized in “Revenue” in the Partnership's accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Derivative instruments that have not yet been settled in cash are reflected as either derivative assets or liabilities in the Partnership’s accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. See Note 6 – Fair Value Measurement for further discussion.
    
The Partnership's derivative contracts exposes it to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. While the Partnership does not require its derivative contract counterparties to post collateral, the Partnership does evaluate the credit standing of such counterparties as deemed appropriate. This evaluation includes reviewing a counterparty’s credit rating and latest financial information. As of March 31, 2017, the Partnership had ten counterparties, all of which are rated Baa1 or better by Moody’s. Seven of the Partnerships's counterparties are lenders under the Partnership's credit facility. The Partnership would have been at risk of losing a fair value amount of $13.2 million had the Partnership's counterparties as a group been unable to fulfill their obligations as of March 31, 2017.
The table below summarizes the fair value and classification of the Partnership’s derivative instruments:
 
As of March 31, 2017
Classification
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Gross Fair
Value
 
Effect of
Counterparty
Netting
 
Net Carrying
Value on
Balance Sheet
 
 
 
 
 

 
(In thousands)
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Current asset
 
Commodity derivative assets
 
$
6,528

 
$
6,528

 
$
—

Long-term asset
 
Deferred charges and other
long-term assets
 
6,669

 
—

 
6,669

Total assets
 
 
 
$
13,197

 
$
6,528

 
$
6,669

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Current liability
 
Commodity derivative liabilities
 
$
11,469

 
$
6,528

 
$
4,941

Long-term liability
 
Commodity derivative liabilities
 
—

 
—

 
—

Total liabilities
 
 
 
$
11,469

 
$
6,528

 
$
4,941

 
As of December 31, 2016
Classification
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Gross Fair
Value
 
Effect of
Counterparty
Netting
 
Net Carrying
Value on
Balance Sheet
 
 
 
 
 

 
(In thousands)
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Current asset
 
Commodity derivative assets
 
$
3,879

 
$
3,879

 
$
—

Long-term asset
 
Deferred charges and other
long-term assets
 
—

 
—

 
—

Total assets
 
 
 
$
3,879

 
$
3,879

 
$
—

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Current liability
 
Commodity derivative liabilities
 
$
20,116

 
$
3,879

 
$
16,237

Long-term liability
 
Commodity derivative liabilities
 
482

 
—

 
482

Total liabilities
 
 
 
$
20,598

 
$
3,879

 
$
16,719


9
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Changes in the fair values of the Partnership’s derivative instruments (both assets and liabilities) are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s commodity derivative instruments (both assets and liabilities) are as follows:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(In thousands)
Beginning fair value of commodity derivative instruments
 
$
(16,719
)
 
$
64,534

Gain (loss) on oil derivative instruments
 
14,305

 
2,926

Gain (loss) on natural gas derivative instruments
 
8,420

 
7,700

Net cash received on settlements of oil derivative
   instruments
 
(2,809
)
 
(12,572
)
Net cash received on settlements of natural gas
   derivative instruments
 
(1,469
)
 
(8,009
)
Net change in fair value of commodity derivative
   instruments
 
18,447

 
(9,955
)
Ending fair value of commodity derivative instruments
 
$
1,728

 
$
54,579

The Partnership had the following open derivative contracts for oil as of March 31, 2017:
 
 

 

 
Range (Per Bbl)
Period and Type of Contract
 
Volume
(Bbl)
 
Weighted Average
(Per Bbl)
 
Low
 
High
Oil Swap Contracts:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

2017
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

First Quarter
 
223,000

 
$
59.06

 
$
51.20

 
$
63.65

Second Quarter
 
615,000

 
54.06

 
51.45

 
55.23

Third Quarter
 
556,000

 
53.29

 
52.04

 
55.23

Fourth Quarter
 
516,000

 
53.56

 
52.57

 
55.23

2018
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

First Quarter
 
475,000

 
$
54.74

 
$
54.50

 
$
55.05

Second Quarter
 
445,000

 
54.73

 
54.50

 
54.90

Third Quarter
 
425,000

 
54.72

 
54.50

 
54.90

Fourth Quarter
 
405,000

 
54.72

 
54.50

 
54.90

The Partnership had the following open derivative contracts for natural gas as of March 31, 2017:
 
 

 

 
Range (Per MMBtu)
Period and Type of Contract
 
Volume
(MMBtu)
 
Weighted Average
(Per MMBtu)
 
Low
 
High
Natural Gas Swap Contracts:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

2017
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Second Quarter
 
12,380,000

 
$
3.11

 
$
2.85

 
$
3.40

Third Quarter
 
11,210,000

 
3.05

 
2.90

 
3.41

Fourth Quarter
 
10,520,000

 
3.13

 
2.92

 
3.57

2018
 


 


 


 


First Quarter
 
9,300,000

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.96

 
$
3.37

Second Quarter
 
8,100,000

 
3.00

 
2.96

 
3.11

Third Quarter
 
7,100,000

 
2.99

 
2.96

 
3.02

Fourth Quarter
 
6,300,000

 
2.99

 
2.96

 
3.02


10
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Partnership has not entered into any additional derivative contracts for oil subsequent to March 31, 2017.
The Partnership entered into the following derivative contracts for natural gas subsequent to March 31, 2017:
 
 
Volume
(MMBtu)
 
Weighted Average
(Per MMBtu)
 
Range (Per MMBtu)
Period and Type of Contract
 
 
 
Low
 
High
Natural Gas Swap Contracts:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

2017
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Second Quarter
 
630,000

 
$
3.36

 
$
3.35

 
$
3.37

Third Quarter
 
730,000

 
3.37

 
3.36

 
3.41

Fourth Quarter
 
250,000

 
3.27

 
3.13

 
3.37

2018
 


 


 


 


First Quarter
 
150,000

 
$
3.13

 
$
3.13

 
$
3.13

Second Quarter
 
320,000

 
3.00

 
2.86

 
3.13

Third Quarter
 
270,000

 
3.02

 
2.90

 
3.13

Fourth Quarter
 
270,000

 
3.02

 
2.90

 
3.13



NOTE 6—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Fair value is defined as the amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Further, ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value, and includes certain disclosure requirements. Fair value estimates are based on either (i) actual market data or (ii) assumptions that other market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including estimates of risk.
ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3—Inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement (including the Partnership’s own assumptions in determining fair value).
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. There were no transfers into, or out of, the three levels of the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended March 31, 2017 or the year ended December 31, 2016.
The carrying value of the Partnership's cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and payables approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The estimated carrying value of all debt as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 approximated the fair value due to variable market rates of interest. These debt fair values, which are Level 3 measurements, were estimated based on the Partnership’s incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, when quoted market prices were not available. The estimated fair values of the Partnership’s financial instruments are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Partnership estimated the fair value of derivative instruments using the market approach via a model that uses inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived from, or corroborated by, observable data. See Note 5 – Derivatives and Financial Instruments for further discussion.
The following table presents information about the Partnership’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis: 

11
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Effect of
Counterparty
Netting
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
Total
 
 
(In thousands)
As of March 31, 2017
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Financial Assets
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commodity derivative instruments
 
$
—

 
$
6,669

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
6,669

Financial Liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commodity derivative instruments
 
—

 
4,941

 
—

 
—

 
4,941

As of December 31, 2016
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Financial Assets
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commodity derivative instruments
 
$
—

 
$
16,719

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
16,719

Financial Liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commodity derivative instruments
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities, as may be acquired in a business combination, and measurements of oil and natural gas property values for assessment of impairment.
The determination of the fair values of proved and unproved properties acquired in business combinations are estimated by discounting the projected cash flows. The factors used to determine fair value include estimates of economic reserves, future operating and development costs, future commodity prices, and a risk-adjusted discount rate. The Partnership has designated these measurements as Level 3. The Partnership’s fair value assessments for recent acquisitions are included in Note 4 – Acquisitions.
Oil and natural gas properties are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using the income approach when assessing for impairment. Proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties are reviewed for impairment when events and circumstances indicate a possible decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of those properties. When assessing producing properties for impairment, the Partnership compares the expected undiscounted projected future cash flows of the producing properties to the carrying amount of the producing properties to determine recoverability. When the carrying amount exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying amount is written down to its fair value, which is measured as the present value of the projected future cash flows of such properties. The factors used to determine fair value include estimates of economic reserves, future operating and development costs, future commodity prices, and a risk-adjusted discount rate.
The Partnership’s estimates of fair value have been determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market data. These estimates involve uncertainty and cannot be determined with precision. There were no significant changes in valuation techniques or related inputs as of March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
The following table presents information about the Partnership’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Net Book
Value1
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
Impairment
 
 
(In thousands)
Three months ended March 31, 2017
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Impaired oil and natural gas properties
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Three months ended March 31, 2016
 


 


 


 


 


Impaired oil and natural gas properties
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
2,499

 
$
8,595

 
$
6,096

 
1 Amount represents net book value at the date of assessment.
 
 
NOTE 7—CREDIT FACILITY
The Partnership maintains a senior secured revolving credit agreement, as amended (the “Senior Line of Credit”). The Senior Line of Credit has a maximum credit amount of $1.0 billion. On October 28, 2015, the Senior Line of Credit was

12
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

amended to extend the term of the agreement from February 3, 2017 to February 4, 2019. The amount of the borrowing base is derived from the value of the Partnership’s oil and natural gas properties as determined by the lender syndicate using pricing assumptions that often differ from the current market for future prices. Effective April 15, 2016, the borrowing base was $450.0 million. The Partnership's fall 2016 borrowing base redetermination process resulted in an increase in the borrowing base to $500.0 million, which became effective October 31, 2016. Effective April 25, 2017, the borrowing base redetermination resulted in an increase to $550.0 million. Drawings on the Senior Line of Credit are used for the acquisition of oil and natural gas properties and for other general business purposes.
Prior to October 31, 2016, borrowings under the Senior Line of Credit bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin between 1.50% and 2.50%, or the Prime rate plus a margin between 0.50% and 1.50%, with the margin depending on the borrowing base utilization percentage. The prime rate was determined to be the higher of the financial institution’s prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% per annum.
Effective October 31, 2016, borrowings under the Senior Line of Credit bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin between 2.00% and 3.00%, or the Prime rate plus a margin between 1.00% and 2.00%, with the margin depending on the borrowing base utilization.
The weighted-average interest rate of the Senior Line of Credit was 3.73% and 3.26% as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Accrued interest is payable at the end of each calendar quarter or at the end of each interest period, unless the interest period is longer than 90 days, in which case interest is payable at the end of every 90-day period. In addition, a commitment fee is payable at the end of each calendar quarter based on either a rate of 0.375% if the borrowing base utilization percentage is less than 50%, or 0.500% per annum if the borrowing base utilization percentage is equal to or greater than 50%. The Senior Line of Credit is secured by substantially all of the Partnership’s producing oil and natural gas assets.
The Senior Line of Credit contains various limitations on future borrowings, leases, hedging, and sales of assets. Additionally, the Senior Line of Credit requires the Partnership to maintain a current ratio of not less than 1.0:1.0 and a ratio of total debt to EBITDAX (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization, and Exploration) of not more than 3.5:1.0. As of March 31, 2017, the Partnership was in compliance with all financial covenants for the Senior Line of Credit.
The aggregate principal balance outstanding was $388.0 million and $316.0 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The unused portion of the available borrowings under the Senior Line of Credit was $112.0 million and $184.0 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
 
 
NOTE 8—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
The Partnership’s business includes activities that are subject to U.S. federal, state, and local environmental regulations with regard to air, land, and water quality and other environmental matters.
The Partnership does not consider the potential remediation costs that could result from issues identified in any environmental site assessments to be significant to the consolidated financial statements, and no provision for potential remediation costs has been made.
Litigation
From time to time, the Partnership is involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Partnership believes existing claims as of March 31, 2017 will be resolved without material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or operations.
 
 
NOTE 9—INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
On January 7, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Partnership’s general partner (the “Board”) approved a special grant of 312,825 restricted common units to Thomas L. Carter, Jr., which restricted common units are subject to limitations on transferability, customary forfeiture provisions, and service-based graded vesting requirements through January 7, 2020.

13
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On January 11, 2017, each non-employee director on the Board, other than Robert E. W. Sinclair, was granted 9,095 fully vested common units for service during 2016. Mr. Sinclair was granted 3,653 fully vested common units for services during 2016 prior to his resignation from the Board. On February 15, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved a grant of awards to each of the Partnership’s executive officers and certain other employees. These awards consisted of 438,067 restricted common units and 438,067 restricted performance units (in the form of phantom units) with distribution equivalent rights. The restricted common units are subject to limitations on transferability, customary forfeiture provisions, and service-based graded vesting requirements through January 7, 2020. The holders of restricted common unit awards have all of the rights of a common unitholder, including non-forfeitable distribution rights. The grant-date fair value of these awards, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized ratably using the straight-line attribution method. The restricted performance units are subject to both performance-based and service-based vesting provisions. The number of common units issued to a recipient upon vesting of a restricted performance unit will be calculated based on performance against certain metrics that relate to the Partnership’s average performance over each calendar year during the performance period commencing January 1, 2017. The target number of common units subject to each restricted performance unit is one; however, based on the achievement of performance criteria, the number of common units that may be received in settlement of each restricted performance unit can range from zero to two times the target number. The restricted performance units are eligible to become earned at the end of the performance period on December 31, 2019.  Compensation expense related to the restricted performance unit awards is determined by multiplying the number of common units underlying such awards that, based on the Partnership’s estimate, are likely to vest, by the grant-date fair value and recognized using the straight-line method. Distribution equivalent rights for the restricted performance unit awards that are expected to vest are charged to partners’ capital. The Compensation Committee of the Board also approved the dollar-value targets for performance-based short-term incentive compensation for executive officers of the Partnership and certain other employees. The Partnership expects to ultimately settle the authorized awards at the end of the performance period in common units of the Partnership.
The table below summarizes incentive compensation expense recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
Incentive compensation expense
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(In thousands)
Cash—long-term incentive plan
 
$
422

 
$
1,850

Equity-based compensation—restricted common and subordinated units
 
1,808

 
2,743

Equity-based compensation—restricted performance units
 
2,353

 
2,613

Board of Directors incentive plan
 
500

 
481

Total incentive compensation expense
 
$
5,083

 
$
7,687

 
 
NOTE 10—REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS
The Partnership had 33,325 and 52,691 redeemable preferred units outstanding with a carrying value of $34.1 million and $54.0 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The aforementioned amounts included accrued distributions of $0.8 million as of March 31, 2017 and $1.3 million as of December 31, 2016. The redeemable preferred units are classified as mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets since redemption is outside the control of the Partnership. The redeemable preferred units are entitled to an annual distribution of 10% of the funded capital of the redeemable preferred units, payable on a quarterly basis in arrears.
The redeemable preferred units are convertible into common and subordinated units at any time at the option of the redeemable preferred unitholders. The redeemable preferred units have an adjusted conversion price of $14.2683 and an adjusted conversion rate of 30.3431 common units and 39.7427 subordinated units per redeemable preferred unit, which reflects the reverse split described in Note 1 – Business and Basis of Presentation and the capital restructuring related to the IPO. The redeemable preferred unitholders can elect to have the Partnership redeem, at face value, up to 26,426 redeemable preferred units as of December 31, 2017, plus any accrued and unpaid distributions. 
The Partnership shall have the right, at its sole option, to redeem an amount of redeemable preferred units equal to the units being redeemed by an owner of preferred units as of each December 31. Any amount of a given year’s redeemable preferred units eligible for redemption not redeemed as of December 31 shall automatically convert to common and subordinated units during the first quarter of the following year.

14
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, 12,742 redeemable preferred units were redeemed for $13.0 million, including accrued unpaid yield. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, 6,624 redeemable preferred units totaling $6.6 million were converted into 200,996 common units and 263,247 subordinated units as a result of the mandatory conversion subsequent to December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 6,064 redeemable preferred units totaling $6.1 million were converted into the equivalent of 184,006 common units and 240,986 subordinated units on an adjusted basis.

NOTE 11—EARNINGS PER UNIT
The Partnership applies the two-class method for purposes of calculating earnings per unit (“EPU”). The holders of the Partnership’s restricted common and subordinated units have all the rights of a unitholder, including non-forfeitable distribution rights. As participating securities, the restricted common and subordinated units are included in the calculation of basic earnings per unit. For the periods presented, the amount of earnings allocated to these participating units was not material. Net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership is allocated to the Partnership’s general partner and the common and subordinated unitholders in proportion to their pro rata ownership after giving effect to distributions, if any, declared during the period. The redeemable preferred units could be converted into 1.0 million common units and 1.3 million subordinated units as of March 31, 2017. At March 31, 2017, if the outstanding redeemable preferred units were converted to common and subordinated units, the effect would be anti-dilutive. The Partnership’s restricted performance unit awards are contingently issuable units that are considered in the calculation of diluted EPU. The Partnership assesses the number of units that would be issuable, if any, under the terms of the arrangement if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, there were approximately 108,000 units related to the Partnership’s restricted performance unit awards included in the calculation of diluted EPU.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common and subordinated unit:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(In thousands, except per unit  amounts)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
 
$
61,583

 
$
10,749

NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
 
(9
)
 
(2
)
DISTRIBUTIONS ON REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS
 
(1,114
)
 
(1,804
)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER AND COMMON AND SUBORDINATED UNITS
 
$
60,460

 
$
8,943

ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS):
 
 

 
 

General partner interest
 
$
—

 
$
—

Common units
 
35,517

 
8,320

Subordinated units
 
24,943

 
623

 
 
$
60,460

 
$
8,943

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO LIMITED PARTNERS PER COMMON AND SUBORDINATED UNIT:
 
 

 
 

Per common unit (basic)
 
$
0.37

 
$
0.09

Weighted average common units outstanding (basic)
 
96,901

 
96,484

Per subordinated unit (basic)
 
$
0.26

 
$
0.01

Weighted average subordinated units outstanding (basic)
 
95,149

 
94,995

Per common unit (diluted)
 
$
0.37

 
$
0.09

Weighted average common units outstanding (diluted)
 
97,590

 
96,752

Per subordinated unit (diluted)
 
$
0.26

 
$
0.01

Weighted average subordinated units outstanding (diluted)
 
95,149

 
94,995



15
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 12—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS    
                  
As discussed in Note 7, the Partnership's spring 2017 borrowing base redetermination process resulted in an increase in the borrowing base from $500.0 million to $550.0 million, with an effective date of April 25, 2017.

In April 2017, 6,899 redeemable preferred units were redeemed for $7.1 million, including accrued unpaid yield.

On May 8, 2017, the Board approved a distribution for the quarter January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017 of $0.2875 per common unit and $0.18375 per subordinated unit. Distributions will be payable on May 25, 2017 to unitholders of record at the close of business on May 18, 2017.

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Partnership entered into agreements to acquire various mineral and royalty interests throughout Angelina and surrounding counties in East Texas previously owned by Angelina County Lumber Company. Through May 5, 2017, the Partnership had agreed to acquire interests in approximately 138,000 gross mineral (approximately 49,000 net) acres, which includes approximately 12,000 net mineral acres in the Shelby Trough, in exchange for 2.0 million common units in the Partnership and $2.2 million in cash based on current seller elections. The transactions are subject to customary closing conditions and the consideration provided is subject to certain pre-closing adjustments. Concurrent with this acquisition activity, the Partnership entered into agreements with a major oil and gas company to accelerate development of Black Stone acreage in several distinct areas within the Shelby Trough.






16

Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “BSM,” the “Partnership,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or similar terms for time periods prior to the IPO refer to Black Stone Minerals Company, L.P. and its subsidiaries, the predecessor for accounting purposes. For time periods subsequent to the IPO, these terms refer to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and its subsidiaries.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements and information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements.”  The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature.  These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on us.  While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, there can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we anticipate.  All comments concerning our expectations for future revenues and operating results are based on our forecasts for our existing operations and do not include the potential impact of any future acquisitions.  Our forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those summarized below:

•
our ability to execute our business strategies;

•
the volatility of realized oil and natural gas prices;

•
the level of production on our properties;

•
regional supply and demand factors, delays, or interruptions of production;

•
our ability to replace our oil and natural gas reserves;

•
our ability to identify, complete, and integrate acquisitions;

•
general economic, business, or industry conditions;

•
competition in the oil and natural gas industry;

•
the ability of our operators to obtain capital or financing needed for development and exploration operations;

•
title defects in the properties in which we invest;

•
the availability or cost of rigs, equipment, raw materials, supplies, oilfield services, or personnel;

•
restrictions on the use of water;

•
the availability of transportation facilities;

•
the ability of our operators to comply with applicable governmental laws and regulations and to obtain permits and governmental approvals;


17

•
federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing;

•
future operating results;

•
future cash flows and liquidity, including our ability to generate sufficient cash to pay quarterly distributions;

•
exploration and development drilling prospects, inventories, projects, and programs;

•
operating hazards faced by our operators;

•
the ability of our operators to keep pace with technological advancements; and 

•
certain factors discussed elsewhere in this filing.
For additional information regarding known material factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results, please see “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Overview
We are one of the largest owners of oil and natural gas mineral interests in the United States. Our principal business is maximizing the value of our existing portfolio of mineral and royalty assets through active management and expanding our asset base through acquisitions of additional mineral and royalty interests. We maximize value through the marketing of our mineral assets for lease, creative structuring of terms on those leases to encourage and accelerate drilling activity, and selectively participating alongside our lessees on a working-interest basis in low-risk development-drilling opportunities on our interests. Our primary business objective is to grow our reserves, production, and cash generated from operations over the long term, while paying, to the extent practicable, a growing quarterly distribution to our unitholders.
As of March 31, 2017, our mineral and royalty interests were located in 41 states and 64 onshore basins in the continental United States. These non-cost-bearing interests include ownership in approximately 50,000 producing wells. We also own non-operated working interests, largely on our mineral and royalty interests. We recognize oil and natural gas revenue from our mineral and royalty and non-operated working interests in producing wells when the oil and natural gas production from the associated acreage is sold. Our other sources of revenue include mineral lease bonus and delay rentals, which are recognized as revenue according to the terms of the lease agreements.
Recent Developments

Acquisitions

On January 4, 2017, the Partnership acquired mineral and royalty interests in Loving County, Texas for approximately $22.3 million in cash. On January 10, 2017, the Partnership acquired mineral and royalty interests in Loving and Winkler Counties of Texas for approximately $5.0 million in cash and $12.0 million of the Partnership’s common units. In addition, several mineral and royalty interest acquisitions were closed in Angelina County, Texas for an aggregate amount of approximately $16.6 million in cash and $0.2 million of our common units; there were two additional mineral and royalty interest acquisitions in Loving and Winkler Counties in Texas for approximately $3.4 million in cash. One additional royalty interest purchase closed in San Augustine County, Texas for approximately $1.0 million. The cash portion of all of the above transactions was funded via proceeds from our credit facility.









18

Farmout Agreement
On February 21, 2017, we announced that we entered into a farmout agreement with Canaan Resource Partners ("Canaan") which covers certain Haynesville and Bossier shale acreage in San Augustine County, Texas operated by XTO Energy Inc. We have an approximate 50% working interest in the acreage. A total of 18 wells are anticipated to be drilled over an initial phase, beginning with wells spud after January 1, 2017. At its option, Canaan may participate in two additional phases with each phase continuing for the lesser of two years or until 20 wells have been drilled. During the three phases of the agreement, Canaan will commit on a phase-by-phase basis and fund 80% of our drilling and completion costs and will be assigned 80% of our working interests in such wells (40% working interest on an 8/8ths basis). After the third phase, Canaan can earn 40% of our working interest (20% working interest on an 8/8ths basis) in additional wells drilled in the area by continuing to fund 40% of our costs for those wells on a well-by-well basis. We will receive a base overriding royalty interest (“ORRI”) before payout and an additional ORRI after payout on all wells drilled under the agreement. The execution of this agreement is anticipated to reduce our future capital expenditures by approximately $30-$35 million in 2017 and by an average of $40-$50 million annually, thereafter.
Business Environment
The information presented below is designed to give a broad overview of the oil and natural gas business environment as it affects us.
Commodity Prices
Oil and natural gas prices have been historically volatile based upon the dynamics of supply and demand. The Energy Information Agency ("EIA") believes that unplanned supply outages in Libya and market perceptions of an increased likelihood of an extension of the voluntary production cuts may have contributed to price increases at the end of March 2017. On March 26, 2017, the Joint Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC")/Non-OPEC Ministerial Monitoring Committee met and reported that there was a high degree of compliance among the members to the agreed-upon crude oil production cuts. The United Arab Emirates announced it would increase compliance with required cuts under the current agreement. In addition, Russia reduced crude oil production in March to bring its levels closer to the required production volumes. Pending an official announcement regarding the extension of the crude oil production agreement and future assessments of compliance, the EIA currently assumes that OPEC crude oil production volumes will approach pre-agreement levels during the second half of 2017.
As a result of growing U.S. supply, which has lowered U.S. crude oil prices relative to international crude oil prices, more U.S. crude oil is being exported to balance the domestic light sweet crude oil market. Recent export data indicates that the marginal destination for U.S. crude oil is Asia. With U.S. supply continuing to grow in the forecast, the EIA expects the marginal destination for U.S. crude oil will continue to be the Asian market. Based on this assumption and associated transportation costs, the EIA expects the spot price spread between Brent crude and West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") crude to be $2 per Bbl in both 2017 and 2018. The EIA expects the market to be relatively balanced in 2017 and forecasts the Brent crude oil spot price to average $54 per Bbl in 2017 and $57 per Bbl in 2018.
According to the EIA, U.S. dry natural gas production is forecast to average 73.1 Bcf per day in 2017, a 0.8 Bcf per day increase from 2016. This increase reverses a 2016 production decline, which was the first annual decline since 2005. Natural gas production in 2018 is forecast to be 4.0 Bcf per day above the 2017 level. The EIA expects new natural gas export capabilities and growing domestic natural gas consumption to contribute to a forecast of Henry Hub natural gas spot prices rising from an average of $3.10 per MMBtu in 2017 to $3.45 per MMBtu in 2018.
To manage the variability in cash flows associated with the projected sale of our oil and natural gas production, we use various derivative instruments, which have recently consisted of fixed-price swap contracts.
 
The following table reflects commodity prices at the end of each quarter presented:

 
 
2017
 
2016
Benchmark Prices
 
First Quarter
 
First Quarter
WTI spot oil price ($/Bbl)
 
$
50.54

 
$
36.94

Henry Hub spot natural gas ($/MMBtu)
 
$
3.13

 
$
1.98

 
Source: EIA

19

Rig Count
As we are not an operator, drilling on our acreage is dependent upon the exploration and production companies that lease our acreage. In addition to drilling plans that we seek from our operators, we also monitor rig counts in an effort to identify existing and future leasing and drilling activity on our acreage.
The following table shows the rig count at the close of each quarter presented:
 
 
2017
 
2016
U.S. Rotary Rig Count
 
First Quarter
 
First Quarter
Oil
 
662

 
372

Natural gas
 
160

 
92

Other
 
2

 
—

Total
 
824

 
464

 
Source: Baker Hughes Incorporated
Natural Gas Storage
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from sales of oil production attributable to our interests; however, the majority of our production is natural gas. Natural gas prices are significantly influenced by storage levels throughout the year. Accordingly, we monitor the natural gas storage reports regularly in the evaluation of our business and its outlook.
Historically, natural gas supply and demand fluctuates on a seasonal basis. From April to October, when the weather is warmer and natural gas demand is lower, natural gas storage levels generally increase. From November to March, storage levels typically decline as utility companies draw natural gas from storage to meet increased heating demand due to colder weather. In order to maintain sufficient storage levels for increased seasonal demand, a portion of natural gas production during the summer months must be used for storage injection. The portion of production used for storage varies from year to year depending on the demand from the previous winter and the demand for electricity used for cooling during the summer months. According to the EIA, U.S. working natural gas inventories on March 31 2017, the traditional end of the withdrawal season, were 15% above the five-year average, but 17% below the record-high level at the end of March 2016. Winter 2015-2016 and winter 2016-2017 seasons experienced unseasonably warm temperatures, but natural gas drawdowns were higher this season because of lower natural gas production and higher exports. In 2017, the EIA expects exports to increase more than production, which should move inventories closer to the five-year average by the time the 2017 heating season commences.
The following table shows natural gas storage volumes by region at the close of each quarter presented:
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
Region
 
First Quarter
 
First Quarter
 
 
(Bcf)
East
 
268

 
439

Midwest
 
479

 
555

Mountain
 
142

 
147

Pacific
 
216

 
262

South Central
 
946

 
1,065

Total
 
2,051

 
2,468

 
Source: EIA

20


How We Evaluate Our Operations
We use a variety of operational and financial measures to assess our performance. Among the measures considered by management are the following:

•
volumes of oil and natural gas produced;

•
commodity prices including the effect of derivative instruments; and

•
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution.
Volumes of Oil and Natural Gas Produced
In order to track and assess the performance of our assets, we monitor and analyze our production volumes from the various basins and plays that comprise our extensive asset base. We also regularly compare projected volumes to actual reported volumes and investigate unexpected variances.
Commodity Prices
Factors Affecting the Sales Price of Oil and Natural Gas
The prices we receive for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) vary by geographical area. The relative prices of these products are determined by the factors affecting global and regional supply and demand dynamics, such as economic conditions, production levels, availability of transportation, weather cycles, and other factors. In addition, realized prices are influenced by product quality and proximity to consuming and refining markets. Any differences between realized prices and NYMEX prices are referred to as differentials. All of our production is derived from properties located in the United States. As a result of our geographic diversification, we are not exposed to concentrated differential risks associated with any single play, trend, or basin.

•
Oil. The substantial majority of our oil production is sold at prevailing market prices, which fluctuate in response to many factors that are outside of our control. NYMEX light sweet crude oil, commonly referred to as WTI, is the prevailing domestic oil pricing index. The majority of our oil production is priced at the prevailing market price with the final realized price affected by both quality and location differentials.
The chemical composition of crude oil plays an important role in its refining and subsequent sale as petroleum products.  As a result, variations in chemical composition relative to the benchmark crude oil, usually WTI, will result in price adjustments, which are often referred to as quality differentials. The characteristics that most significantly affect quality differentials include the density of the oil, as characterized by its American Petroleum Institute (“API”) gravity, and the presence and concentration of impurities, such as sulfur.
Location differentials generally result from transportation costs based on the produced oil’s proximity to consuming and refining markets and major trading points.

•
Natural Gas. The NYMEX price quoted at Henry Hub is a widely used benchmark for the pricing of natural gas in the United States. The actual volumetric prices realized from the sale of natural gas differ from the quoted NYMEX price as a result of quality and location differentials. 
Quality differentials result from the heating value of natural gas measured in Btus and the presence of impurities, such as hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. Natural gas containing ethane and heavier hydrocarbons has a higher Btu value and will realize a higher volumetric price than natural gas which is predominantly methane, which has a lower Btu value. Natural gas with a higher concentration of impurities will realize a lower volumetric price due to the presence of the impurities in the natural gas when sold or the cost of treating the natural gas to meet pipeline quality specifications.
Natural gas, which currently has a limited global transportation system, is subject to price variances based on local supply and demand conditions and the cost to transport natural gas to end user markets.

21

Hedging
We enter into derivative instruments to partially mitigate the impact of commodity price volatility on our cash generated from operations. From time to time, such instruments may include fixed-price swaps, fixed-price contracts, costless collars, and other contractual arrangements. We generally employ a “rolling hedge” strategy whereby we hedge a significant portion of our proved developed producing reserves 12 to 24 months into the future. The impact of these derivative instruments could affect the amount of revenue we ultimately realize. Since 2015, we have only entered into fixed-price swap contracts. Under fixed-price swap contracts, a counterparty is required to make a payment to us if the settlement price is less than the swap strike price. Conversely, we are required to make a payment to the counterparty if the settlement price is greater than the swap strike price. We may employ contractual arrangements other than fixed-price swap contracts in the future to mitigate the impact of price fluctuations. If commodity prices decline in the future, our hedging contracts will partially mitigate the effect of lower prices on our future revenue.
Our open oil and natural gas derivative contracts as of March 31, 2017, and as of the date of this filing, are detailed in Note 5 – Derivatives and Financial Instruments to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our credit agreement limits the extent to which we can hedge our future production. Under the terms of our credit agreement, we are able to hedge all of our estimated production from our proved developed producing reserves based on the most recent reserve information provided to our lenders. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes. Including derivative contracts entered into subsequent to March 31, 2017, we have hedged 95.9% and 95.5% of our available oil and condensate hedge volumes, respectively and 98.8% and 99.2% of our available natural gas hedge volumes for the remainder of 2017 and 2018, respectively.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures used by our management and external users of our financial statements such as investors, research analysts, and others, to assess the financial performance of our assets and our ability to sustain distributions over the long term without regard to financing methods, capital structure, or historical cost basis.
We define EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest expense, income taxes and depreciation, depletion, and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA adjusted for impairment of oil and natural gas properties, accretion of ARO, unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivative instruments, and non-cash equity-based compensation. We define cash available for distribution as Adjusted EBITDA plus or minus amounts for certain non-cash operating activities, estimated replacement capital expenditures, cash interest expense, and distributions to noncontrolling interests and preferred unitholders.
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, cash flows from operating activities, or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP as measures of our financial performance. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution have important limitations as analytical tools because they exclude some but not all items that affect net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Our computation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution may differ from computations of similarly titled measures of other companies.

22

The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash available for distribution to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016

 
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Net income (loss)
 
$
61,583

 
$
10,749

Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDA:
 
 

 
 

Add:
 
 

 
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 
26,379

 
21,721

Interest expense
 
3,507

 
1,048

EBITDA
 
91,469

 
33,518

Add:
 
 

 
 

Impairment of oil and natural gas properties
 
—

 
6,096

Accretion of asset retirement obligations
 
247

 
274

Equity-based compensation
 
4,661

 
5,900

Unrealized loss on commodity derivative instruments
 
—

 
9,955

Less:
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain on commodity derivative instruments
 
(18,447
)
 
—

Adjusted EBITDA
 
77,930

 
55,743

Adjustments to reconcile to cash generated from operations:
 
 

 
 

Less:
 
 

 
 

Change in deferred revenue
 
(325
)
 
(203
)
Cash interest expense
 
(3,292
)
 
(851
)
(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net
 
(924
)
 
(4,680
)
 Estimated replacement capital expenditures1
 
(3,750
)
 
—

Cash generated from operations
 
69,639

 
50,009

Less:
 
 

 
 

Cash paid to noncontrolling interests
 
(25
)
 
(33
)
Redeemable preferred unit distributions
 
(1,114
)
 
(1,804
)
Cash generated from operations available for distribution on common and subordinated units and reinvestment in our business
 
$
68,500

 
$
48,172

 
1 On August 3, 2016, the Board established a replacement capital expenditure estimate of $15.0 million for the period of April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017. There was no established estimate of replacement capital expenditures prior to this period.


23

Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
The following table shows our production, revenues, pricing, and expenses for the periods presented:
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Variance
 
 
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except for realized prices)
Production:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Oil and condensate (MBbls)
 
861

 
886

 
(25
)
 
(2.8
)%
Natural gas (MMcf)1
 
14,060

 
11,250

 
2,810

 
25.0
 %
Equivalents (MBoe)
 
3,204

 
2,761

 
443

 
16.0
 %
Revenue:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Oil and condensate sales
 
$
40,474

 
$
27,248

 
13,226

 
48.5
 %
Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales
 
47,701

 
25,112

 
22,589

 
90.0
 %
Gain on commodity derivative instruments
 
22,725

 
10,626

 
12,099

 
113.9
 %
Lease bonus and other income
 
13,682

 
1,395

 
12,287

 
880.8
 %
Total revenue
 
$
124,582

 
$
64,381

 
60,201

 
93.5
 %
Realized prices:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Oil and condensate ($/Bbl)
 
$
47.01

 
$
30.75

 
16.26

 
52.9
 %
Natural gas ($/Mcf)1
 
3.39

 
2.23

 
1.16

 
52.0
 %
Equivalents ($/Boe)
 
$
27.52

 
$
18.96

 
8.56

 
45.1
 %
Operating expenses:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Lease operating expense
 
$
4,189

 
$
4,889

 
(700
)
 
(14.3
)%
Production costs and ad valorem taxes
 
11,902

 
7,062

 
4,840

 
68.5
 %
Exploration expense
 
562

 
8

 
554

 
6,925.0
 %
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
 
26,379

 
21,721

 
4,658

 
21.4
 %
Impairment of oil and natural gas properties
 
—

 
6,096

 
(6,096
)
 
(100.0
)%
General and administrative

17,212


17,401


(189
)

(1.1
)%
 
1  
As a mineral-and-royalty-interest owner, we are often provided insufficient and inconsistent data on NGL volumes by our operators. As a result, we are unable to reliably determine the total volumes of NGLs associated with the production of natural gas on our acreage. Accordingly, no NGL volumes are included in our reported production; however, revenue attributable to NGLs is included in our natural gas revenue and our calculation of realized prices for natural gas.

Revenue
Total revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 increased compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2016. Production for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 averaged 35.6 MBoe per day, an increase of 5.3 MBoe per day compared to the corresponding period in 2016. The increase in total revenue is primarily due to higher commodity prices, increased production, larger gains from commodity derivative instruments, and higher lease bonus revenue, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016.
Oil and condensate sales. Oil and condensate sales during the period were higher than the first quarter of 2016 due to higher realized prices. Our total oil and condensate production was lower than the first quarter of 2016. Our mineral-and-royalty-interest oil and condensate volumes accounted for 79.6% and 78.5% of total oil and condensate volumes for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our mineral-and-royalty-interest oil and condensate volumes decreased 1.5% in the first quarter of 2017 relative to the corresponding period in 2016, primarily driven by lower production in our Eagle Ford Shale assets.   

24

Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales. Natural gas and NGL sales increased for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period for 2016. Higher commodity prices and higher production volumes, largely driven by new wells in the Haynesville play, were primarily responsible for the increase in our natural gas and NGL revenues. Mineral-and-royalty-interest production accounted for 51.4% and 61.6% of our natural gas volumes for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Gain (loss) on commodity derivative instruments. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized $14.3 million of gains from oil commodity contracts, which included cash received of $2.8 million, compared to recognized net gains of $2.9 million in the same period of 2016. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized $8.4 million of gains from natural gas commodity contracts, which included cash received of $1.5 million, compared to recognized net gains of $7.7 million in the same period of 2016.
Lease bonus and other income. When we lease our mineral interests, we generally receive an upfront cash payment, or a lease bonus. Leasing activity in the Williston Basin, Canyon Lime, Mississippian/Woodford, Haynesville/Bossier, and Permian comprised the majority of leases written in the first quarter.
Operating and Other Expenses
Lease operating expense. Lease operating expense includes normally recurring expenses associated with our non-operated working interests necessary to produce hydrocarbons from our oil and natural gas wells, as well as certain nonrecurring expenses, such as well repairs. Lease operating expense decreased for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to the plugging of uneconomical working interest wells and fewer remedial projects initiated by our operators.
Production costs and ad valorem taxes. Production taxes include statutory amounts deducted from our production revenues by various state taxing entities. Depending on the regulations of the states where the production originates, these taxes may be based on a percentage of the realized value or a fixed amount per production unit. This category also includes the costs to process and transport our production to applicable sales points. Ad valorem taxes are jurisdictional taxes levied on the value of oil and natural gas minerals and reserves. Rates, methods of calculating property values, and timing of payments vary between taxing authorities. For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, production costs and ad valorem taxes increased from the quarter ended March 31, 2016, generally as a result of higher commodity prices and natural gas production volumes.
Exploration expense. Exploration expense typically consists of dry-hole expenses and geological and geophysical costs, including seismic costs, and is expensed as incurred under the successful efforts method of accounting. Exploration expense increased for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The 2017 expense represents costs incurred to acquire 3-D seismic information, related to our mineral and royalty interests, from a third-party service provider.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization. Depletion is an estimate of the amount of cost basis of oil and natural gas properties attributable to the volume of hydrocarbons extracted during a period, calculated on a units-of-production basis. Estimates of proved developed producing reserves are a major component of the calculation of depletion. We adjust our depletion rates semi-annually based upon mid-year and year-end reserve reports, except when circumstances indicate that there has been a significant change in reserves or costs. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization increased for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to the impact of higher production rates.
Impairment of oil and natural gas properties. Individual categories of oil and natural gas properties are assessed periodically to determine if the net book value for these properties has been impaired. Management periodically conducts an in-depth evaluation of the carrying amounts of property acquisitions, successful exploratory wells, development activity, undeveloped leasehold, and mineral interests to identify impairments. There were no impairments for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. Impairments totaled $6.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 primarily due to changes in reserve values resulting from declines in future expected net cash flows as a result of lower commodity prices as of March 31, 2016.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses are costs not directly associated with the production of oil and natural gas and include the cost of employee salaries and related benefits, office expenses, and fees for professional services. For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, general and administrative expenses decreased as compared to the same period in 2016. In 2017, costs attributable to our long-term incentive plans were lower than in the corresponding period in 2016.
Interest expense. Interest expense was higher in the first quarter of 2017 due to increased borrowings under our credit facility. Average outstanding borrowings during the first quarter of 2017 were higher than the first quarter of 2016 due to

25

funding of acquisitions in 2017 and 2016, common unit repurchases in 2016, and redemptions associated with our preferred units.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations, borrowings under our credit facility, and proceeds from the issuance of equity and debt. Our primary uses of cash are for distributions to our unitholders and for investing in our business, specifically the acquisition of mineral and royalty interests and our selective participation on a non-operated working-interest basis in the development of our oil and natural gas properties. 
The board of directors of our general partner has adopted a policy pursuant to which distributions equal in amount to the applicable minimum quarterly distribution will be paid on each common and subordinated unit for each quarter to the extent we have sufficient cash generated from our operations after establishment of cash reserves, if any, and after we have made the required distributions to the holders of our outstanding preferred units. However, we do not have a legal or contractual obligation to pay distributions quarterly or on any other basis, at the applicable minimum quarterly distribution rate or at any other rate, and there is no guarantee that we will pay distributions to our unitholders in any quarter. Our minimum quarterly distribution provides the common unitholders a specified priority right to distributions over the subordinated unitholders. The board of directors of our general partner may change the foregoing distribution policy at any time and from time to time.
We intend to finance our future acquisitions and working-interest capital needs with cash generated from operations, borrowings from our credit facility, and proceeds from any future issuances of equity and debt. Replacement capital expenditures are expenditures necessary to replace our existing oil and natural gas reserves or otherwise maintain our asset base over the long-term. Like a number of other master limited partnerships, we are required by our partnership agreement to retain cash from our operations in an amount equal to our estimated replacement capital requirements. The board of directors of our general partner established a replacement capital expenditure estimate of $15.0 million for the period of April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017.
Cash Flows
The following table shows our cash flows for the periods presented: 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
 
$
63,954

 
$
25,906

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
 
(64,086
)
 
(35,082
)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
 
4,365

 
956

 













26

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Operating Activities. Our operating cash flows are dependent, in large part, on our production, realized commodity prices, derivative settlements, lease bonus revenue, and operating expenses. Our cash flows from operations increased from $25.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $64.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher cash collections of $44.8 million related to higher oil and natural gas sales and changes in working capital as compared to the corresponding period in 2016.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities increased by $29.0 million in the first three months of 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016 primarily due to multiple mineral and property acquisitions that were closed during the first three months of 2017. Lower capital expenditures for our working interest properties partially offset the overall increase in investing activities.
Financing Activities. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, we generated cash from financing activities as we increased our borrowings under our credit facility as compared to the corresponding period in 2016. Financing activities were further impacted by the redemption of redeemable preferred units in 2017.
Capital Expenditures
At the beginning of each calendar year, we establish a capital budget and then monitor it throughout the year. Our capital budget is created based upon our estimate of internally-generated cash flows and the ability to borrow and raise additional capital. Actual capital expenditure levels will vary, in part, based on actual cash generated, the economics of wells proposed by our operators for our participation, and the successful closing of acquisitions. The timing, size, and nature of acquisitions are unpredictable.
Our 2017 drilling expenditures are expected to be between $50 million and $60 million. Approximately 90% of our drilling capital budget will be spent in the Haynesville/Bossier play with the remainder expected to be spent in various plays including the Bakken/Three Forks and Wolfcamp plays. On February 16, 2017, we entered into a farmout agreement which will reduce our future capital requirements and will generate additional royalty income. The farmout covers our working interests within an approximate 34,000-acre block in San Augustine County, Texas.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred $20.4 million related to drilling and completion costs, primarily in the Haynesville/Bossier play. We also incurred approximately $60.6 million related to mineral interest acquisitions in the current period. See Note 4 – Acquisitions for further discussion.
Credit Facility
On January 23, 2015, we amended and restated our $1.0 billion senior secured revolving credit agreement. Under this third amended and restated credit facility, the commitment of the lenders equals the lesser of the aggregate maximum credit amounts of the lenders and the borrowing base, which is determined based on the lenders’ estimated value of our oil and natural gas properties. On October 28, 2015, the third amended and restated credit facility was further amended to extend the term of the agreement from February 3, 2017 to February 4, 2019. Borrowings under the third amended and restated credit facility may be used for the acquisition of properties, cash distributions, and other general corporate purposes.  Our regular, semi-annual borrowing base redetermination process resulted in a decrease of the borrowing base from $550.0 million to $450.0 million, effective April 15, 2016. Our fall 2016 borrowing base redetermination process resulted in an increase in the borrowing base to $500.0 million, which became effective October 31, 2016. Effective April 25, 2017, the borrowing base redetermination resulted in an increase to $550.0 million. As of March 31, 2017, we had outstanding borrowings of $388.0 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.73%.
The borrowing base under the third amended and restated credit agreement is redetermined semi-annually, typically in April and October of each year, by the administrative agent, taking into consideration the estimated loan value of our oil and natural gas properties consistent with the administrative agent’s normal oil and natural gas lending criteria. The administrative agent’s proposed redetermined borrowing base must be approved by all lenders to increase our existing borrowing base, and by two-thirds of the lenders to maintain or decrease our existing borrowing base. In addition, we and the lenders (at the election of two-thirds of the lenders) each have discretion to have the borrowing base redetermined once between scheduled redeterminations.
Outstanding borrowings under the third amended and restated credit facility bear interest at a floating rate elected by us equal to an alternative base rate (which is equal to the greatest of the Prime rate, the Federal Funds effective rate plus 0.50%, or 1-month LIBOR plus 1.00%) or LIBOR, in each case, plus the applicable margin. Through October 2016, the applicable

27

margin ranged from 0.50% to 1.50% in the case of the alternative base rate and from 1.50% to 2.50% in the case of LIBOR, in each case depending on the amount of borrowings outstanding in relation to the borrowing base. Subsequent to the closing of our fall redetermination on October 31, 2016, the applicable margin ranges from 1.00% to 2.00% in the case of the alternative base rate and from 2.00% to 3.00% in the case of LIBOR, depending on the borrowings outstanding in relation to the borrowing base.
We are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging from a 0.375% to 0.500% annualized rate on the unused portion of the borrowing base, depending on the amount of the borrowings outstanding in relation to the borrowing base. Principal may be optionally repaid from time to time without premium or penalty, other than customary LIBOR breakage, and is required to be paid (a) if the amount outstanding exceeds the borrowing base, whether due to a borrowing base redetermination or otherwise, in some cases subject to a cure period, or (b) at the maturity date. The third amended and restated credit facility is secured by liens on substantially all of our producing properties.
The third amended and restated credit agreement contains various affirmative, negative, and financial maintenance covenants. These covenants, among other things, limit additional indebtedness, additional liens, sales of assets, mergers and consolidations, dividends and distributions, transactions with affiliates, and entering into certain swap agreements, as well as require the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The third amended and restated credit agreement contains two financial covenants: total debt to EBITDAX of 3.5:1.0 or less and a modified current ratio of 1.0:1.0 or greater as defined in the credit agreement. Distributions are not permitted if there is a default under the third amended and restated credit agreement (including due to a failure to satisfy one of the financial covenants) or during any time that our borrowing base is lower than the loans outstanding under the third amended and restated credit facility. The lenders have the right to accelerate all of the indebtedness under the third amended and restated credit facility upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any event of default, and the third amended and restated credit agreement contains customary events of default, including non-payment, breach of covenants, materially incorrect representations, cross-default, bankruptcy, and change of control. There are no cure periods for events of default due to non-payment of principal and breaches of negative and financial covenants, but non-payment of interest and breaches of certain affirmative covenants are subject to customary cure periods. As of March 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2017, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations previously disclosed in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2017, we did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Related Estimates
As of March 31, 2017, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and related estimates previously disclosed in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
New and Revised Financial Accounting Standards
The effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


28

Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 

Commodity Price Risk
Our major market risk exposure is the pricing of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids produced by our operators. Realized prices are primarily driven by the prevailing global prices for oil and prices for natural gas and NGLs in the United States. Prices for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids have been volatile for several years, and we expect this unpredictability to continue in the future. The prices that our operators receive for production depend on many factors outside of our or their control. To reduce the impact of fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices on our revenues, we use commodity derivative instruments to reduce our exposure to price volatility of oil and natural gas. The counterparties to the contracts are unrelated third parties. The contracts settle monthly in cash based on a designated floating price. The designated floating price is based on the NYMEX benchmark for oil and natural gas. We have not designated any of our contracts as fair value or cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the changes in fair value of the contracts are included in net income in the period of the change. See Note 5 – Derivatives and Financial Instruments and Note 6 – Fair Value Measurement to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.
Commodity prices have declined in recent years. To estimate the effect lower prices would have on our reserves, we applied a 10% discount to the SEC commodity pricing for the twelve months ended March 31, 2017. Applying this discount results in an approximate 2.0% reduction of proved reserve volumes as compared to the undiscounted March 31, 2017 SEC pricing scenario.
Counterparty and Customer Credit Risk
Our derivative contracts expose us to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. While we do not require our counterparties to our derivative contracts to post collateral, we do evaluate the credit standing of such counterparties as we deem appropriate. This evaluation includes reviewing a counterparty’s credit rating and latest financial information. As of March 31, 2017, we had ten counterparties, all of which are rated Baa1 or better by Moody’s. Seven of our counterparties are lenders under our credit facility.
Our principal exposure to credit risk results from receivables generated by the production activities of our operators. The inability or failure of our significant operators to meet their obligations to us or their insolvency or liquidation may adversely affect our financial results. However, we believe the credit risk associated with our operators and customers is acceptable.
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to changes in interest rates on our indebtedness. As of March 31, 2017, we had $388.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our credit facility, bearing interest at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.73%. The impact of a 1% increase in the interest rate on this amount of debt would have resulted in an increase in interest expense, and a corresponding decrease in our results of operations, of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, assuming that our indebtedness remained constant throughout the period. We may use certain derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to variable interest rates in the future, but we do not currently have any interest rate hedges in place.
 
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of management of our general partner, including our general partner’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our general partner’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our general partner’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2017.

29

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Due to the nature of our business, we are, from time to time, involved in routine litigation or subject to disputes or claims related to our business activities. In the opinion of our management, none of the pending litigation, disputes or claims against us, if decided adversely, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

Item 1A.
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, readers should carefully consider the risks under the heading “Risk Factors” in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There has been no material change in our risk factors from those described in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 2.         Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On January 10, 2017, we closed on the purchase of certain mineral interests using 625,098 common units valued at $12.0 million to fund a portion of the purchase price. The remaining portion of the purchase price was funded with cash. The issuance of the common units pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof.
On March 15, 2017, we closed on the purchase of certain mineral interests using 10,000 common units valued at $0.2 million to fund a portion of the purchase price. The remaining portion of the purchase price was funded with cash. The issuance of the common units pursuant to the deed was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof.

30

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following tables set forth our purchases of our common, subordinated, and preferred units during the three months ended March 31, 2017:
Purchases of Common Units
Period
 
Total Number of Common Units Purchased
 
Average Price Paid Per Unit
 
Total Number of Common Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Dollar Value of Common Units That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1 - January 31, 2017
 
75,704

 
$
19.18 1

 
 
 
—

 
$
—

 
March 1 - March 31, 2017
 
350,321

 
$
17.35 1

 
 
 
—

 
 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of Subordinated Units
Period
 
Total Number of Subordinated Units Purchased
 
Average Price Paid Per Unit
 
Total Number of Subordinated Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Dollar Value of Subordinated Units That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1 - January 31, 2017
 
14,220

 
 
2 
 
 
—

 

 
$
—

 
March 1 - March 31, 2017
 
24,807

 
 
2 
 
 
—

 
 
 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of Preferred Units
Period
 
Total Number of Preferred Units Purchased
 
Average Price Paid Per Unit
 
Total Number of Preferred Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Dollar Value of Preferred Units That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
February 1 - February 28, 2017
 
1,556

 
$
1,015

 
 
1,556 3

 

 
$
—

 
March 1 - March 31, 2017
 
11,186

 
$
1,024

 
 
11,186 3

 
 
 
—

 


1 Includes units withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of certain restricted common and subordinated units held by our executive officers and certain other employees.
2 For tax withholding purposes, the value of the subordinated units was fixed at a discount to the closing price of our common units as of the date of each vesting event.
3 Pursuant to our partnership agreement, on December 31 of each year through 2017 (each date, a “Scheduled Redemption Date”), each preferred unitholder may, upon written notice, require us to redeem a portion of its preferred units for a cash price per preferred unit equal to the sum of $1,000.00 plus the unpaid accrued yield through that date (the aggregate amount, the “Holder Redemption Price”). We will pay to the redeeming preferred unitholder the Holder Redemption Price plus, in the event of a payment after the Scheduled Redemption Date, interest on the Holder Redemption Price at a rate of 10% per annum (subject to adjustment following certain events of default by us from the Scheduled Redemption Date until the date paid to the redeeming preferred unitholder.) This year, holders redeemed 12,742 preferred units for a total cost of approximately $13.0 million. The maximum number of preferred units that may yet be purchased represents all preferred units outstanding as of March 31, 2017, which could be redeemed during future redemption windows. In addition, the preferred units may be converted, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time, and without the payment of additional consideration, into common units and subordinated units at the then-effective conversion rate. The preferred units have a conversion rate of 30.3431 common units and 39.7427 subordinated units per preferred unit, subject to adjustment.
 



Item 6.
Exhibits
The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.


31

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
BLACK STONE MINERALS, L.P.
 
 
 
By:
 
Black Stone Minerals GP, L.L.C.,
its general partner
 
 
 
 
Date: May 9, 2017
By:
 
/s/ Thomas L. Carter, Jr.
 
 
 
Thomas L. Carter, Jr.
 
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
Date: May 9, 2017
By:
 
/s/ Jeffrey P. Wood
 
 
 
Jeffrey P. Wood
 
 
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)


32

Exhibit Index
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Black Stone Minerals, L.P.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 19, 2015 (SEC File No. 333-202875)).
 
 
 
3.2
 
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Black Stone Minerals, L.P.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 19, 2015 (SEC File No. 333-202875)).
 
 
 
3.3
 
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Black Stone Minerals, L.P., dated May 6, 2015, by and among Black Stone Minerals GP, L.L.C. and Black Stone Minerals Company, L.P., as amended by Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. dated as of April 15, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-37362)).
 
 
 
*31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
*31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
*32.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
*101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
*101.SCH
 
XBRL Schema Document
 
 
 
*101.CAL
 
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
*101.LAB
 
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
*101.PRE
 
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
*101.DEF
 
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
 
*      Filed or furnished herewith.


33
Exhibit


Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act OF 1934, as amended
I, Thomas L. Carter, Jr., certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (the “registrant”);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: May 9, 2017
 
/s/ Thomas L. Carter, Jr.
 
 
Thomas L. Carter, Jr.
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
Black Stone Minerals GP, L.L.C.,
the general partner of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.



Exhibit


Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act OF 1934, as amended
I, Jeffrey P. Wood, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (the “registrant”);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
 
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: May 9, 2017
 
/s/ Jeffrey P. Wood
 
 
Jeffrey P. Wood
 
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
Black Stone Minerals GP, L.L.C.,
the general partner of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.



Exhibit


Exhibit 32.1
Certification of
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
under Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350
In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (the “Partnership”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Thomas L. Carter, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Jeffrey P. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:
(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
Date: May 9, 2017
/s/ Thomas L. Carter, Jr.
 
Thomas L. Carter, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Black Stone Minerals GP, L.L.C.,
the general partner of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
 
 
Date: May 9, 2017
/s/ Jeffrey P. Wood
 
Jeffrey P. Wood
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Black Stone Minerals GP, L.L.C.,
the general partner of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.